CHALLENGES EXPERIENCED BY LEARNERS WITH VISUAL IMPAIRMENT ON HIGH-STAKE ASSESSMENT

Authors

  • Setseetso Matobako
  • Maretsepile Molahloe

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24234/se.v6i1.306

Keywords:

inclusive education, assessment, visual impairment, limited opportunities for inclusion

Abstract

Recent studies show that there is a very low enrolment rate of learners with special educational needs (LSEN) in institutions of higher learning locally. This might be because most LSEN attain low achievement scores in the terminal examinations which make them not meet the admission requirements of such institutions. Consequently, the number of professionals with disabilities would then be very meager. There might be a wide range of contributing factors that turn out to be realized at the terminal examinations stage even though the root causes could have been identified and dealt with at the earlier grades. The extreme manifestation of this challenge occurred when the 2017 cohort of learners with visual impairment in one regular school attained a 100% fail rate in Junior Certificate examinations. This definitely calls for investigating the reasons that led to this unfavourable outcome. The paper aims at presenting the facts from the perspective of learners due to their direct involvement in this issue. Data was generated from the interviews conducted with three visually impaired learners. Data were analyzed using social justice education theories and capability framework. There are two main findings revealed in this study. Firstly, learners were not involved in deciding on the format of the question paper they preferred. Secondly, it was indicated that the terminal examination did not align with both instructional practice and formative assessment. This article recommends that learners should be involved in decision-making concerning their welfare. Apart from that, summative assessment should be aligned with instructional practice.

References

Broderick, A. & Quinlivan, S. 2017. The right to education: Article 24 of the CRPD. In C. O’ Mahony, & G. Quinn (Eds.), The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Comparative, regional and thematic perspectives (pp. 293-208) Dublin: Clarus Press.

Broderick, A. 2018. Equality of What? The Capability Approach and the Right to Education for Persons with Disabilities. Social Inclusion, 6(1): 29-39.

Carter, E.W., Cushing, L.S., Clark, N.M. & Kennedy, C.H. 2005. Effects of peer support interventions on students' access to the general curriculum and social interactions. Research and practice for persons with severe disabilities, 30(1): 15-25.

Cawthon, S.W., Ho, E., Patel, P.G., Potvin, D.C. & Trundt, K.M. 2009. Multiple constructs and effects of accommodations on accommodated test scores for students with disabilities. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(18): 2-9.

Christensen, L., Carver, W., VanDeZande, J. & Lazarus, S. 2011. Accommodations manual: how to select, administer, and evaluate the use of accommodations for instruction and assessment of students with disabilities (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Assessing Special Education.

Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2016. General Comment 4, UN Doc. CRPD/C/GC/4.

Cooper, K. & White, R.E. 2011. Qualitative research in the post-modern era: contexts of qualitative research. London: Springer Science & Business Media.

Dalkilic, M. & Vadeboncoeur, J. A. 2016. Re-framing inclusive education through the capability approach: An elaboration of the model of relational inclusion. Global Education Review, 3(3): 122-137.

De Beco, G. 2014. The right to inclusive education according to Article 24 of the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: background, requirements and (remaining) questions. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 32(3): 263-287.

Diaz, M., Hoag, L., Shasteen, B., Schade, B.P. & Larwin, K.H. 2016. Perspectives of the educational experiences of students with visual impairments. European Journal of Special Education Research, 1(2): 80-89.

Eva, A.L. & Walker, B. 2010. Leveling the playing field: preparing teachers for equitable instruction in diverse, inclusive classrooms. AILACTE Journal, 7(1): 15-32.

Florian, L., Dee, L. & Devecchi, C. 2008. How can the capability approach contribute to understanding provision for people with learning difficulties? Prospero, 14(1): 24-33.

Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D. & Capizzi, A. M. 2006. Identifying appropriate test accommodations for students with learning disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 37(6): 1-8.

Gray, C. 2009. A qualitatively different experience: mainstreaming pupils with a visual impairment in Northern Ireland. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 24(2): 169-182.

Heled, E., Elul, N., Ptito, M. & Chebat, D.R. 2022. Deductive reasoning and working memory skills in individuals with blindness. Sensors, 22(5). Accessed: https://doi.org/10.3390/s22052062.

Heppen, J., Faria, A.M., Thomsen, K., Sawyer, K., Townsend, M., Kutner, M., Stachel, S., Lewis, S. & Casserly, M. 2010. Using Data to Improve Instruction in the Great City Schools: Key Dimensions of Practice. Urban Data Study. Council of the Great City Schools.

Lewandowski, L.J., Lovett, B.J. & Rogers, C.L. 2008. Extended time as a testing accommodation for students with reading disabilities: does a rising tide lift all ships? Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 26(4): 315-324.

Lovett, B.J., 2010. Extended time testing accommodations for students with disabilities: answers to five fundamental questions. Review of Educational Research, 80(4): 611-638.

Meda, L., 2016. Are we helping them to pass or setting them up for failure? Assessment-related experiences of partially sighted students. Journal of Communication, 7(1): 43-52.

Mthethwa-Sommers, S. (2014). What Is Social Justice Education? Narratives of Social Justice Educators. New York, USA: Springer.

Ofiesh, N.S. & Hughes, C.A. 2002. How much time?: A review of the literature on extended test time for postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 16(1): 2-16.

Oka, N. & Nakamura, M. 2005. Criticisms of full inclusion in the United States by an organization for people who are blind and teachers of students with visual disabilities. The Japanese Journal of Special Education, 42(6): 547-558.

Oyebanji, M.S. & Idiong, U.S. 2021. Challenges of teaching mathematics to students with visual impairment. Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning, 4(1): 1-6.

Porter, J. & Lacey, P. 2008. Safeguarding the needs of children with a visual impairment in non-VI special schools. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 26(1): 50-62.

Rieser, R. 2012. Implementing inclusive education: a Commonwealth guide to implementing Article 24 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Commonwealth Secretariat.

Shakir, M.A., Shafiq, F. & Khalid, M.N., 2022. Assessment of learning achievement of visually impaired children at primary level. Pakistan Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 9(2): 44-52.

Spenceley, L.M. & Wheeler, S. 2016. The use of extended time by college students with disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 29(2): 141-150.

Terzi, L. (2005). Beyond the dilemma of difference: the capability approach to disability and special educational needs. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 39(3): 443-459.

Terzi, L. (2007). Capability and educational equality: the just distribution of resources to students with disabilities and special educational needs. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 41(4): 757-773.

Terzi, L. (2014). Reframing inclusive education: educational equality as capability equality. Cambridge Journal of Education, 44(4): 479-493.

Terzi, L. 2005. Beyond the dilemma of difference: the capability approach to disability and special educational needs. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 39(3): 443-459.

Toson, A. L., Burrello, L. C. & Knollman, G. 2013. Educational justice for all: the capability approach and inclusive education leadership. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(5): 490-506.

UNESCO. 1994. World conference on special needs education: Access and quality. Salamanca, Spain, 7-10 June 1994.

United Nations. 2006. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Optional Protocol. United Nations, New York.

Published

2023-03-30

How to Cite

Matobako, S. ., & Molahloe , M. . (2023). CHALLENGES EXPERIENCED BY LEARNERS WITH VISUAL IMPAIRMENT ON HIGH-STAKE ASSESSMENT. Armenian Journal of Special Education, 7(1), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.24234/se.v6i1.306